The Role of Psychotherapy in Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy: A Critical Debate
- Cadiz Salazar
- Feb 6
- 3 min read
The role of psychotherapy in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) is a topic of ongoing debate. Key questions include: How much therapy should accompany a psychedelic intervention? What type of therapy is most effective? Should psychotherapy always be included?
Recent developments highlight these issues. The FDA’s rejection of Lykos Therapeutics' application to approve MDMA-assisted therapy (MDMA-AT) for PTSD treatment underscores the complexity of evaluating PAT. The FDA approves drugs, not psychotherapies, and this distinction raises questions about whether PAT should be considered a purely pharmacological treatment or a combined intervention.

The Synergy Between Psychedelics and Psychotherapy
PAT uniquely integrates psychedelics, such as psilocybin or MDMA, with psychotherapy, enhancing psychological and relational healing. Research suggests psychedelics accelerate cognitive, emotional, and behavioral transformation, amplifying the effects of therapy. Moreover, the therapeutic relationship plays a critical role in treatment success, reinforcing the importance of psychotherapy within PAT.
We advocate for psychotherapy as an essential component of PAT while recognizing the need for research to determine optimal therapeutic approaches and intensity.
Should Psychotherapy Always Be Included in PAT?
Some researchers argue that psychedelic administration with basic psychological support may be sufficient, while others insist that psychotherapy is crucial. Goodwin et al. (2023) suggest there is limited evidence that PAT functions as a truly integrated treatment. They propose that a safe environment and minimal support might be enough to facilitate meaningful change.
Critics point out that some PAT trials use nondirective counseling, which lacks strong empirical support for treating PTSD and depression. However, rather than dismissing psychotherapy outright, we should focus on identifying which therapeutic approaches work best alongside psychedelics. Clinical trials should compare PAT with and without psychotherapy to determine its added value.
Another concern is that psychotherapy complicates research by making it harder to isolate the drug’s effects. However, PAT is not just about the drug—it is a holistic treatment where the setting and therapist interactions contribute to outcomes. Attempting to separate these elements could limit our understanding of their synergy.
What Type of Therapy Best Complements PAT?
Even among those who support psychotherapy in PAT, debate remains over which approach is most effective. Some advocate for cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) due to its structured framework and extensive research base. However, psychedelic experiences are often unpredictable, and rigid therapeutic structures may not align with their transformative potential.
CBT’s goal-oriented nature might conflict with the open-ended, introspective states psychedelics induce. Instead, humanistic, transpersonal, somatic, and depth-oriented therapies could provide a more flexible and adaptive framework. Prematurely designating CBT as the default approach could limit the exploration of other potentially effective methods and create biases in research.
Moving Forward: Research and Inclusivity in PAT Trials
The best way to resolve these debates is through rigorous, well-designed research. Clinical trials should compare psychedelic administration alone with PAT that includes various psychotherapy approaches to determine their relative efficacy.
Patient perspectives must also be considered. Surveys and qualitative research can help identify what individuals seeking PAT need and prefer. Additionally, ensuring diverse representation in PAT trials is essential to making these treatments accessible and effective for all populations.
Ultimately, the role of psychotherapy in PAT is an open question that requires continued study. While we advocate for its inclusion, only data can provide definitive answers. Through further research, thoughtful regulation, and open dialogue, we can refine PAT into a safe and effective treatment for those who need it most.
Comments